On this page
What Does Apraxia Mean?
Apraxia is a neurological disorder derived from two Greek words: the prefix a- (negation) and praxía (to do, to act). Collectively, these mean “inability to act” or “inability to perform purposeful movements”. It is defined as the loss of the ability to execute learned, goal-directed motor skills despite the absence of paralysis, muscle weakness, sensory loss, or failure to understand the command.
Put simply: a person with apraxia knows what they want to do, understands the instruction, and has the physical capacity to move, yet they cannot correctly execute the familiar, previously learned movement. The desire and the muscular ability are both preserved, but the neurological competence to organize and sequence the movement has been lost.
A Concrete Example
Consider the everyday act of tying shoelaces, knotting a tie, or buttoning a shirt. These are deeply automatized motor programs: activities that most adults perform without a second thought, having learned and rehearsed them thousands of times. A person with apraxia may find themselves completely unable to execute these movements on command, even though they clearly remember having done so before and genuinely want to perform the action. They may attempt to start the movement, but what emerges is clumsy, disorganized, or entirely off-target.
Crucially, and this is clinically important, many patients with apraxia lack awareness of their own deficit (a phenomenon known as anosognosia). They may not recognize that their movements are inappropriate or that they are failing to complete the task.
Apraxia vs. Dyspraxia
While the terms are sometimes used interchangeably, there is a meaningful clinical distinction:
- Apraxia refers to the complete or near-complete inability to perform the target movement.
- Dyspraxia refers to a partial or less severe form of the same deficit. The individual may eventually accomplish the motor goal, but only with significant difficulty, inefficiency, and poor coordination disproportionate to the apparent simplicity of the task.
Dyspraxia can occur as a developmental condition in children, sometimes called Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD), or as an acquired deficit following neurological injury, as in adult apraxia. In children, dyspraxia affects the normal acquisition and refinement of motor skills and can significantly impact academic performance, self-care, and social participation.
Both apraxia and dyspraxia represent disorders of motor planning and programming, not disorders of the muscles or peripheral nerves themselves.
Causes
Apraxia results from dysfunction of the cerebral hemispheres, particularly specific regions of the cortex that are responsible for storing, planning, and executing learned motor programs. Understanding the neuroanatomy helps clarify why different lesion locations produce different types of apraxia.
Neuroanatomical Basis
The neural substrate of skilled, goal-directed movement involves a distributed network including:
- The left frontal lobe, particularly the premotor cortex and supplementary motor area (SMA), is critical for planning and programming complex voluntary movements. The SMA is particularly important for the internal generation of movement sequences.
- The left parietal lobe, especially the inferior parietal lobule (supramarginal and angular gyri): the storehouse for learned “movement engrams”, which are complex three-dimensional representations of previously acquired motor programs. This is where the brain “remembers” how to perform skilled actions.
- The corpus callosum: the white matter bridge connecting the two hemispheres. Damage here can isolate the right hemisphere from the left hemisphere’s motor programs, producing characteristic callosal apraxia.
When any component of this network is damaged, whether by stroke, tumor, trauma, neurodegeneration, or metabolic injury, the ability to access and execute these stored motor representations is disrupted, resulting in apraxia.
Specific Causes
Cerebrovascular disease (stroke)
Stroke, whether ischemic or hemorrhagic, is the most common acquired cause of apraxia in adults. Left hemisphere strokes are far more likely to produce apraxia than right hemisphere strokes, reflecting the dominant role of the left hemisphere in language and skilled motor programming. The left inferior parietal cortex, left premotor cortex, and the white matter tracts connecting them are particularly vulnerable.
Traumatic brain injury
Head trauma can cause apraxia through direct cortical injury, diffuse axonal injury, or focal contusions affecting the premotor or parietal regions.
Brain tumors
Primary or metastatic brain tumors can produce apraxia when they infiltrate or compress critical motor programming areas.
Neurodegenerative diseases and dementia
Dementia in its various forms can be associated with progressive apraxia as cortical atrophy advances:
- Alzheimer’s disease: ideomotor and ideational apraxia become increasingly prevalent as the disease progresses to moderate and severe stages, significantly impairing activities of daily living.
- Corticobasal degeneration (CBD): this is a particularly important cause of apraxia in older adults. CBD is a rare but severe neurodegenerative disorder causing profound, asymmetric apraxia, often beginning in one limb, combined with rigidity, dystonia, and other cortical and basal ganglia signs. It produces a variety of apraxia subtypes and is among the conditions most strongly associated with the full apraxia syndrome.
- Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP): can present with elements of apraxia, particularly of gaze and limb movement.
- Frontotemporal dementia (FTD): particularly the non-fluent/agrammatic variant of primary progressive aphasia, which often co-occurs with apraxia of speech.
Metabolic and toxic brain injury
Systemic metabolic disorders affecting brain function, including hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, severe electrolyte disturbances, hepatic encephalopathy, and toxic encephalopathies, can impair the cortical networks subserving motor programming.
Congenital and developmental causes
In children, apraxia may be congenital, present from birth, typically as a consequence of abnormal development or malformation of the central nervous system. Childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) is a recognized developmental speech disorder characterized by inconsistent errors in the production of speech sounds, not explained by neuromuscular deficits.
Genetic causes
Oculomotor apraxia represents a special case: it is a genetically determined condition, typically inherited in an autosomal dominant or recessive pattern, with the dominant form mapped to chromosome 2p13. Several genetic subtypes of oculomotor apraxia exist (Cogan type, Ataxia-Oculomotor Apraxia types 1 and 2), each associated with different gene mutations and clinical features.
Symptoms and Types
The cardinal symptom of apraxia is the inability to perform a purposeful, previously learned movement in the absence of paralysis, weakness, sensory impairment, or comprehension failure. The patient understands the command and wants to comply, but when they attempt the movement, the result is clumsy, poorly controlled, spatially inaccurate, or entirely wrong. In some patients, involuntary movements may occur spontaneously even when the patient cannot replicate them on command (a phenomenon called “automatic-voluntary dissociation”).
Apraxia encompasses a diverse family of disorders, each reflecting damage to a specific component of the motor planning network. The major subtypes include:
Buccofacial (Orofacial) Apraxia
Buccofacial apraxia is the most common form and involves the inability to perform voluntary movements of the face, lips, tongue, and pharynx on command, even though the patient can perform the same movements reflexively or spontaneously. Examples include:
- Inability to lick the lips on request (yet able to lick food off the lips automatically)
- Inability to whistle, blow out a candle, cough voluntarily, or wink on command
- Difficulty miming oral actions, such as pretending to blow a kiss or chew
This form commonly accompanies left hemisphere strokes and is frequently associated with aphasia.
Limb Apraxia
Limb apraxia is the most extensively studied form due to its significant impact on activities of daily living. It affects the ability to perform precise, skilled movements with the arms and hands (or less commonly the legs).
A patient with limb apraxia may be unable to:
- Demonstrate how to use a screwdriver, hammer, or scissors when asked, even though they know perfectly well what these tools are for and have used them successfully in the past
- Execute a military salute on command
- Wave goodbye
The deficit is most evident when movements are performed in isolation or to verbal command. Paradoxically, patients may perform the same action better in the context of the real task (holding the actual tool) than when miming it without the object.
Acrоkinetic (Limb-Kinetic) Apraxia
Acrоkinetic apraxia involves the loss of fine, dexterous, individuated finger and limb movements, resulting in slow, coarse, clumsy, and poorly modulated actions. Unlike ideomotor apraxia, the patient in this case does not perform the wrong movement. Instead, they perform the right movement, but it is executed clumsily and without the normal fluid precision. This form is particularly associated with lesions of the contralateral premotor cortex.
Ideational Apraxia
Ideational apraxia represents a breakdown at the highest conceptual level of motor programming, specifically the inability to conceive the correct sequence of component actions needed to complete a complex, multi-step goal. The patient cannot construct the mental “plan” of the activity as a whole.
This is most apparent in multi-step activities of daily living, such as:
- Dressing (putting underwear on before trousers, shoes before socks)
- Preparing food (pouring water before boiling it, mixing sugar before adding coffee)
- Personal hygiene sequences
In ideational apraxia, individual component movements may be relatively preserved, but their temporal organization and sequencing is disrupted. This form is particularly associated with diffuse bilateral cortical damage, as seen in Alzheimer’s disease.
Ideomotor Apraxia
Ideomotor apraxia is the most widely studied and clinically recognized subtype. It is characterized by the inability to translate a motor idea into the correct action in response to a verbal command or gesture imitation request. The key distinguishing feature from ideational apraxia is that the deficit is evident even when the patient is asked to simply imitate another person’s gesture (without a verbal command).
Typical manifestations include:
- Incorrect spatial orientation of the limb (wrong angle or plane of movement)
- Incorrect timing or sequencing of movement components
- Use of a body part as the tool itself (e.g., using a finger as the hammer instead of miming holding one)
- Perseveration (repeating a previously performed action instead of performing the requested new one)
Ideomotor apraxia is most commonly caused by left parietal or left premotor cortex lesions and is strongly associated with left hemisphere stroke.
Verbal (Speech) Apraxia
Apraxia of speech (also called verbal apraxia or acquired apraxia of speech in adults; childhood apraxia of speech or CAS in children) is a motor speech disorder characterized by difficulty planning and coordinating the precise oral-motor movements required for speech production.
It is distinct from dysarthria (where weakness or paralysis of the speech muscles is the primary problem) and from aphasia (a language disorder). In apraxia of speech:
- The speech musculature is physically intact
- The patient knows what they want to say
- The difficulty lies in planning and programming the articulatory movements
Clinical features include:
- Inconsistent speech sound errors: the same word may be pronounced differently on successive attempts
- Groping: visible searching movements of the lips and tongue as the patient attempts to find the correct articulatory position
- Prosodic disturbance: abnormal speech rhythm and stress patterns
- Difficulty initiating speech despite knowing the intended word
- Errors are more frequent on longer and more complex words
Childhood apraxia of speech is a recognized developmental condition that can significantly delay speech acquisition and requires specialized speech-language therapy.
Constructional Apraxia
Constructional apraxia is the inability to copy, draw, or assemble figures and structures, both from memory and through imitation, even simple geometric shapes. Patients may be unable to:
- Copy a drawing of a clock face, a cube, or a house
- Arrange matchsticks or blocks into a pattern
- Reproduce a geometric design
Unlike other forms of apraxia that predominantly reflect left hemisphere dysfunction, constructional apraxia can result from lesions in either hemisphere, though the character of the errors differs: right hemisphere lesions tend to produce more disorganized, spatially distorted copies, while left hemisphere lesions produce simplified, impoverished reproductions.
Oculomotor Apraxia
Oculomotor apraxia is the inability to voluntarily direct gaze toward a specific target on command, despite intact eye muscles and reflexive eye movements. The patient cannot smoothly and accurately shift their gaze from one object to another at will. Compensatory head thrusting movements are often observed as the patient attempts to “capture” a visual target.
As noted above, oculomotor apraxia has an important genetic basis and may be part of broader neurological syndromes including ataxia-oculomotor apraxia types 1 and 2 (AOA1 and AOA2).
Associated Features
Apraxia, particularly in the context of left hemisphere strokes, is frequently accompanied by aphasia (impaired language production and/or comprehension), since the neural networks for language and skilled motor programming overlap substantially in the left hemisphere. The co-occurrence of aphasia and apraxia can complicate clinical assessment, as verbal comprehension deficits may confound the evaluation of motor command execution.
Is There a Cure? Prognosis
The prognosis for apraxia is highly variable and depends critically on the nature, location, and extent of the underlying brain injury, as well as the patient’s age, overall health, and the availability of rehabilitation resources.
Post-Stroke Apraxia
In patients with stroke-related apraxia, spontaneous neurological recovery, driven by brain plasticity, axonal reorganization, and functional compensation, is common in the first weeks to months following the event. Many patients experience significant improvement during this period, particularly with intensive rehabilitation. However, the degree of recovery is highly individual:
- Patients with smaller, well-circumscribed lesions tend to recover better
- Patients with large left hemisphere strokes or bilateral lesions typically have a more guarded prognosis
- The presence of co-existing aphasia adds complexity to rehabilitation
Congenital and Developmental Apraxia
Children with congenital apraxia, including childhood apraxia of speech, can often make substantial gains with appropriate and intensive early intervention. The developing brain’s remarkable plasticity allows for significant compensatory reorganization, particularly when therapy begins early. Many children with CAS achieve age-appropriate or near-normal speech production with sustained, specialized therapy.
Similarly, children with dyspraxia (developmental coordination disorder) can learn to compensate for their motor deficits through targeted physical therapy, occupational therapy, and specialized educational programs. While the underlying neural differences may persist, the functional impact can be substantially reduced.
Dementia-Related Apraxia
In patients with neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, corticobasal degeneration, or frontotemporal dementia, apraxia tends to be progressive and irreversible, reflecting ongoing neuronal loss. Treatment in these contexts focuses on functional maintenance, compensatory strategies, and caregiver support rather than curative intervention.
Corticobasal Degeneration
CBD carries a particularly poor prognosis: it is relentlessly progressive, and current treatments can only address symptoms rather than modify the disease course. Life expectancy following diagnosis is typically 6–8 years.
Treatment
There is currently no pharmacological treatment proven to specifically reverse or substantially improve apraxia across its various forms. Management therefore focuses on:
- Treating the underlying cause (where possible)
- Rehabilitation-based approaches to maximize functional independence
- Compensatory strategies and environmental adaptations
Treating the Underlying Condition
When apraxia is secondary to a treatable condition, addressing that condition is the first therapeutic priority:
- Stroke: acute reperfusion therapy (thrombolysis or thrombectomy) if appropriate, followed by comprehensive stroke rehabilitation
- Brain tumor: surgery, radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy as indicated
- Metabolic encephalopathy: correction of the metabolic disturbance
- Corticobasal degeneration: symptomatic treatments for rigidity (levodopa, clonazepam), dystonia (botulinum toxin), and myoclonus; multidisciplinary palliative-oriented care
Rehabilitation Approaches
Occupational therapy is central to the management of limb apraxia and functional disabilities affecting activities of daily living. Occupational therapists work with patients to:
- Retrain specific motor programs through repetitive, structured practice
- Develop compensatory strategies to accomplish daily tasks despite motor planning deficits
- Adapt the home environment to maximize safety and independence
- Train caregivers in techniques that facilitate the patient’s performance
Physical therapy is beneficial for patients with stroke, traumatic brain injury, and developmental coordination disorder, focusing on:
- Improving movement quality and coordination
- Strengthening and gait rehabilitation where co-existing motor weakness is present
- Task-specific movement training
Speech-language therapy (SLT) is the cornerstone of treatment for apraxia of speech, both in adults and children. Evidence-based approaches include:
- Motor learning principles: intensive, systematic practice of speech targets with immediate feedback
- Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing (DTTC): a structured approach for childhood apraxia of speech using simultaneous production, fading cues, and distributed practice
- Nuffield Dyspraxia Programme (NDP3): widely used in the UK for CAS
- Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): in severe cases, supporting communication through non-verbal means (communication boards, electronic devices)
Special education programs for children with congenital apraxia or developmental coordination disorder provide structured motor skill teaching within a supportive educational environment, allowing children to develop compensatory strategies and build confidence.
The Role of Neuroplasticity
A key principle underlying all rehabilitation for apraxia is neuroplasticity, the brain’s ability to reorganize its functional architecture in response to experience, learning, and injury. Intensive, task-specific, repetitive practice drives cortical reorganization, potentially allowing undamaged brain regions to partially compensate for the lost functions. This is why early, intensive rehabilitation consistently produces better outcomes than delayed or infrequent treatment.
Caregiver and Family Support
In patients with progressive or severe apraxia, particularly those with dementia or advanced neurodegenerative disease, caregiver education and support are integral components of care. Caregivers benefit from learning:
- How to give clear, simple, one-step verbal instructions
- The value of demonstration over verbal explanation (since showing a movement may be more effective than describing it)
- How to structure the environment to support successful task completion
- Stress management and access to respite care resources
